
Lawsuit alleges sexual harassment, retaliation and wrongful termination on 2025 tour
Will Smith is facing a new lawsuit stemming from his “Based on a True Story: 2025” Tour, after a touring violinist accused him of sexual harassment and retaliation. The plaintiff, Brian King Joseph, claims the alleged behaviour occurred during the spring leg of the tour. According to the filing, Joseph alleges he was subjected to inappropriate conduct while employed as part of Smith’s live show. The lawsuit also names Smith’s management company as a defendant. It culminated in a “hotel intrusion” while on tour
Joseph claims the environment on tour became hostile after he did not respond to alleged sexual advances. He further alleges that his employment was terminated as a result of his complaint. The accusations are strongly denied by Smith’s camp. Denials are denials. This needs to be proved and defended in a court of law.
Allegations of grooming and exploitation
In the complaint, Joseph accuses Smith of what he describes as a pattern of “predatory behaviour.” He alleges Smith “deliberately groomed and primed him for further sexual exploitation” while leveraging his status and influence.
The lawsuit claims this behaviour unfolded gradually and was masked as professional mentorship. Joseph argues that the power imbalance made it difficult to object or remove himself from the situation. He alleges that the conduct escalated over time during the tour.
The lawsuit details that Smith told Joseph this and other similar expressions indicating his closeness to him:
“You and I have such a special connection, that I don’t have with anyone else”
The filing characterises the alleged actions as calculated rather than incidental. These claims form a central pillar of the legal case.
The note and the HIV medication allegation

One of the most salacious claims in the lawsuit centres on an alleged handwritten note and prescription medication.
According to the complaint, Brian King Joseph says he found a note that he understood to be from Will Smith which he describes as sexually suggestive and inappropriate.
The filing alleges the note included language to the effect of Smith wanting to “take care of” Joseph and suggesting a deeper, more intimate connection beyond a professional relationship. Joseph claims the wording made him feel singled out and pressured, given Smith’s power and status on the tour.
The lawsuit further alleges that Joseph later discovered HIV prevention medication, commonly known as PrEP, which he says heightened his discomfort. Importantly, the complaint does not allege Smith is HIV-positive. Instead, it argues that the note and the medication together contributed to Joseph’s belief that he was being groomed for sexual exploitation.
Smith’s representatives have reportedly denied the claims and characterised them as misleading and sensationalised.
Claims of retaliation and termination
Joseph further alleges that after setting boundaries, he experienced retaliation from the tour’s leadership.
According to the lawsuit, he was sidelined professionally and excluded from opportunities he had previously been promised.
The complaint claims his termination was wrongful and directly linked to rejecting the alleged behaviour. Joseph argues there was no legitimate performance-related reason for his dismissal. The lawsuit states that the termination caused both financial and reputational harm. It also alleges emotional distress tied to the experience. These claims broaden the case beyond harassment to employment law violations.
Management company named as defendant

The lawsuit also names Treyball Studios Management as a co-defendant.
Joseph alleges the company either knew or should have known about the alleged conduct. He claims there were failures in oversight, reporting mechanisms and duty of care.
The filing argues that management enabled a culture where misconduct could occur without consequence. It also alleges that internal complaints were ignored or mishandled. This aspect of the lawsuit could expand liability beyond Smith personally. It places scrutiny on how major tours are managed behind the scenes.
Legal and public fallout
Will Smith has not personally commented in detail, but representatives have reportedly denied all allegations.
The lawsuit arrives at a sensitive time for him, whose public image has already faced intense scrutiny in recent years.
Legal experts note that such cases can take months or years to resolve. The outcome may hinge on corroborating evidence and witness testimony from the tour.
Public reaction has been swift, with debate playing out across social media. As the case proceeds, more details are likely to emerge through court filings. For now, the allegations remain claims, not proven facts. But it’s salacious nonetheless as the lawsuit strongly infers and alleges Will Smith is gay or at least bisexual.



